Behavior of different numerical schemes for population genetic drift problems
For researchers simulating population genetics, this work highlights the critical need to avoid numerical viscosity in schemes for degenerate convection-dominated problems.
The paper investigates numerical schemes for degenerated convection-dominated parabolic equations modeling genetic drift, finding that upwind and one central scheme fail due to artificial viscosity, while a specific central scheme preserves expectation and total probability.
In this paper, we focus on numerical methods for the genetic drift problems, which is governed by a degenerated convection-dominated parabolic equation. Due to the degeneration and convection, Dirac singularities will always be developed at boundary points as time evolves. In order to find a \emph{complete solution} which should keep the conservation of total probability and expectation, three different schemes based on finite volume methods are used to solve the equation numerically: one is a upwind scheme, the other two are different central schemes. We observed that all the methods are stable and can keep the total probability, but have totally different long-time behaviors concerning with the conservation of expectation. We prove that any extra infinitesimal diffusion leads to a same artificial steady state. So upwind scheme does not work due to its intrinsic numerical viscosity. We find one of the central schemes introduces a numerical viscosity term too, which is beyond the common understanding in the convection-diffusion community. Careful analysis is presented to prove that the other central scheme does work. Our study shows that the numerical methods should be carefully chosen and any method with intrinsic numerical viscosity must be avoided.