CVCLIRNov 20, 2014

CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluation

arXiv:1411.5726v25471 citations
Originality Highly original
AI Analysis

This addresses the problem of reliable evaluation for image description systems in computer vision and NLP, providing a benchmark for future comparisons.

The paper tackles the challenge of evaluating image description quality by introducing a novel paradigm based on human consensus, resulting in the CIDEr metric that better captures human judgment than existing metrics.

Automatically describing an image with a sentence is a long-standing challenge in computer vision and natural language processing. Due to recent progress in object detection, attribute classification, action recognition, etc., there is renewed interest in this area. However, evaluating the quality of descriptions has proven to be challenging. We propose a novel paradigm for evaluating image descriptions that uses human consensus. This paradigm consists of three main parts: a new triplet-based method of collecting human annotations to measure consensus, a new automated metric (CIDEr) that captures consensus, and two new datasets: PASCAL-50S and ABSTRACT-50S that contain 50 sentences describing each image. Our simple metric captures human judgment of consensus better than existing metrics across sentences generated by various sources. We also evaluate five state-of-the-art image description approaches using this new protocol and provide a benchmark for future comparisons. A version of CIDEr named CIDEr-D is available as a part of MS COCO evaluation server to enable systematic evaluation and benchmarking.

Code Implementations24 repos

Data from Papers with Code (CC-BY-SA-4.0)

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes