SYSYMar 23, 2015

Sampled-Data Consensus over Random Networks

arXiv:1503.06714
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

Provides theoretical foundations for consensus in random networks with sampled-data control, relevant for distributed control systems.

The paper proves that for random networks with sampled-data control, consensus in expectation, mean square, and almost surely are equivalent under a simple relation between sampling interval and network size. It derives necessary and sufficient conditions for mean-square consensus and establishes bounds on the sampling interval for almost sure consensus.

This paper considers the consensus problem for a network of nodes with random interactions and sampled-data control actions. We first show that consensus in expectation, in mean square, and almost surely are equivalent for a general random network model when the inter-sampling interval and network size satisfy a simple relation. The three types of consensus are shown to be simultaneously achieved over an independent or a Markovian random network defined on an underlying graph with a directed spanning tree. For both independent and Markovian random network models, necessary and sufficient conditions for mean-square consensus are derived in terms of the spectral radius of the corresponding state transition matrix. These conditions are then interpreted as the existence of critical value on the inter-sampling interval, below which global mean-square consensus is achieved and above which the system diverges in mean-square sense for some initial states. Finally, we establish an upper bound on the inter-sampling interval below which almost sure consensus is reached, and a lower bound on the inter-sampling interval above which almost sure divergence is reached. Some numerical simulations are given to validate the theoretical results and some discussions on the critical value of the inter-sampling intervals for the mean-square consensus are provided.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes