Manifold Optimization for Gaussian Mixture Models
This addresses the problem of improving optimization methods for GMMs, which is incremental but offers practical gains for statistical modeling applications.
The paper tackled parameter estimation for Gaussian Mixture Models by proposing a reparameterization for Riemannian manifold optimization, which matched or outperformed Expectation Maximization in many practical settings with less variability in running times.
We take a new look at parameter estimation for Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs). In particular, we propose using \emph{Riemannian manifold optimization} as a powerful counterpart to Expectation Maximization (EM). An out-of-the-box invocation of manifold optimization, however, fails spectacularly: it converges to the same solution but vastly slower. Driven by intuition from manifold convexity, we then propose a reparamerization that has remarkable empirical consequences. It makes manifold optimization not only match EM---a highly encouraging result in itself given the poor record nonlinear programming methods have had against EM so far---but also outperform EM in many practical settings, while displaying much less variability in running times. We further highlight the strengths of manifold optimization by developing a somewhat tuned manifold LBFGS method that proves even more competitive and reliable than existing manifold optimization tools. We hope that our results encourage a wider consideration of manifold optimization for parameter estimation problems.