MLLGOct 12, 2015

VB calibration to improve the interface between phone recognizer and i-vector extractor

arXiv:1510.03203v24 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses incremental improvements in speaker recognition systems by refining the interface between phone recognizers and i-vector extractors for more accurate processing.

The paper tackled the problem of improving i-vector extractor accuracy by correcting the theoretical misunderstanding of its training as maximum-likelihood, revealing it as a mean-field variational Bayes method, and proposed calibrating the approximate posterior to better fit the generative model, resulting in enhanced performance.

The EM training algorithm of the classical i-vector extractor is often incorrectly described as a maximum-likelihood method. The i-vector model is however intractable: the likelihood itself and the hidden-variable posteriors needed for the EM algorithm cannot be computed in closed form. We show here that the classical i-vector extractor recipe is actually a mean-field variational Bayes (VB) recipe. This theoretical VB interpretation turns out to be of further use, because it also offers an interpretation of the newer phonetic i-vector extractor recipe, thereby unifying the two flavours of extractor. More importantly, the VB interpretation is also practically useful: it suggests ways of modifying existing i-vector extractors to make them more accurate. In particular, in existing methods, the approximate VB posterior for the GMM states is fixed, while only the parameters of the generative model are adapted. Here we explore the possibility of also mildly adjusting (calibrating) those posteriors, so that they better fit the generative model.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes