A Framework to Adjust Dependency Measure Estimates for Chance
This addresses a fundamental issue in data mining for researchers and practitioners, but it is incremental as it builds on existing dependency measures.
The paper tackles the problem of dependency measure estimates being biased by finite sample sizes, making them hard to interpret and compare. It proposes a framework to adjust these estimates, showing improvements in interpretability for the Maximal Information Coefficient and accuracy in ranking variables for random forests.
Estimating the strength of dependency between two variables is fundamental for exploratory analysis and many other applications in data mining. For example: non-linear dependencies between two continuous variables can be explored with the Maximal Information Coefficient (MIC); and categorical variables that are dependent to the target class are selected using Gini gain in random forests. Nonetheless, because dependency measures are estimated on finite samples, the interpretability of their quantification and the accuracy when ranking dependencies become challenging. Dependency estimates are not equal to 0 when variables are independent, cannot be compared if computed on different sample size, and they are inflated by chance on variables with more categories. In this paper, we propose a framework to adjust dependency measure estimates on finite samples. Our adjustments, which are simple and applicable to any dependency measure, are helpful in improving interpretability when quantifying dependency and in improving accuracy on the task of ranking dependencies. In particular, we demonstrate that our approach enhances the interpretability of MIC when used as a proxy for the amount of noise between variables, and to gain accuracy when ranking variables during the splitting procedure in random forests.