SentiWords: Deriving a High Precision and High Coverage Lexicon for Sentiment Analysis
This work addresses the trade-off between precision and coverage in sentiment analysis lexica for researchers and practitioners, though it is incremental as it builds upon existing SentiWordNet methods.
The authors tackled the challenge of creating a prior polarity lexicon for sentiment analysis by developing an ensemble method that blends existing techniques based on SentiWordNet, resulting in SentiWords, a lexicon of approximately 155,000 words that achieves high precision and coverage, and outperforms other lexica in sentiment analysis tasks.
Deriving prior polarity lexica for sentiment analysis - where positive or negative scores are associated with words out of context - is a challenging task. Usually, a trade-off between precision and coverage is hard to find, and it depends on the methodology used to build the lexicon. Manually annotated lexica provide a high precision but lack in coverage, whereas automatic derivation from pre-existing knowledge guarantees high coverage at the cost of a lower precision. Since the automatic derivation of prior polarities is less time consuming than manual annotation, there has been a great bloom of these approaches, in particular based on the SentiWordNet resource. In this paper, we compare the most frequently used techniques based on SentiWordNet with newer ones and blend them in a learning framework (a so called 'ensemble method'). By taking advantage of manually built prior polarity lexica, our ensemble method is better able to predict the prior value of unseen words and to outperform all the other SentiWordNet approaches. Using this technique we have built SentiWords, a prior polarity lexicon of approximately 155,000 words, that has both a high precision and a high coverage. We finally show that in sentiment analysis tasks, using our lexicon allows us to outperform both the single metrics derived from SentiWordNet and popular manually annotated sentiment lexica.