ROAILGJan 5, 2016

Learning Preferences for Manipulation Tasks from Online Coactive Feedback

arXiv:1601.00741v1129 citations
Originality Highly original
AI Analysis

This addresses the challenge of efficiently teaching personal and assembly line robots complex preferences in real-world settings, representing a novel approach to human-robot interaction.

The paper tackles the problem of learning intricate preferences for robot manipulation tasks in context-rich environments, proposing a coactive online learning framework where users provide incremental improvements rather than optimal demonstrations, and demonstrates that users can train robots with just a few feedbacks in minutes.

We consider the problem of learning preferences over trajectories for mobile manipulators such as personal robots and assembly line robots. The preferences we learn are more intricate than simple geometric constraints on trajectories; they are rather governed by the surrounding context of various objects and human interactions in the environment. We propose a coactive online learning framework for teaching preferences in contextually rich environments. The key novelty of our approach lies in the type of feedback expected from the user: the human user does not need to demonstrate optimal trajectories as training data, but merely needs to iteratively provide trajectories that slightly improve over the trajectory currently proposed by the system. We argue that this coactive preference feedback can be more easily elicited than demonstrations of optimal trajectories. Nevertheless, theoretical regret bounds of our algorithm match the asymptotic rates of optimal trajectory algorithms. We implement our algorithm on two high degree-of-freedom robots, PR2 and Baxter, and present three intuitive mechanisms for providing such incremental feedback. In our experimental evaluation we consider two context rich settings -- household chores and grocery store checkout -- and show that users are able to train the robot with just a few feedbacks (taking only a few minutes).\footnote{Parts of this work has been published at NIPS and ISRR conferences~\citep{Jain13,Jain13b}. This journal submission presents a consistent full paper, and also includes the proof of regret bounds, more details of the robotic system, and a thorough related work.}

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes