LGMLFeb 21, 2016

Uniform Hypergraph Partitioning: Provable Tensor Methods and Sampling Techniques

arXiv:1602.06516v452 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses computational bottlenecks in hypergraph partitioning for computer vision applications, but it is incremental as it builds on prior work on dense unweighted hypergraphs.

The paper tackles the problem of partitioning weighted uniform hypergraphs, which is computationally expensive due to dense adjacency tensors and the need to compute all edge weights, by proposing provable and efficient algorithms that justify empirical sampling techniques and include empirical comparisons.

In a series of recent works, we have generalised the consistency results in the stochastic block model literature to the case of uniform and non-uniform hypergraphs. The present paper continues the same line of study, where we focus on partitioning weighted uniform hypergraphs---a problem often encountered in computer vision. This work is motivated by two issues that arise when a hypergraph partitioning approach is used to tackle computer vision problems: (i) The uniform hypergraphs constructed for higher-order learning contain all edges, but most have negligible weights. Thus, the adjacency tensor is nearly sparse, and yet, not binary. (ii) A more serious concern is that standard partitioning algorithms need to compute all edge weights, which is computationally expensive for hypergraphs. This is usually resolved in practice by merging the clustering algorithm with a tensor sampling strategy---an approach that is yet to be analysed rigorously. We build on our earlier work on partitioning dense unweighted uniform hypergraphs (Ghoshdastidar and Dukkipati, ICML, 2015), and address the aforementioned issues by proposing provable and efficient partitioning algorithms. Our analysis justifies the empirical success of practical sampling techniques. We also complement our theoretical findings by elaborate empirical comparison of various hypergraph partitioning schemes.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes