CRSEApr 8, 2016

A Security Evaluation Framework for U.K. E-Goverment Services Agile Software Development

arXiv:1604.02368v16 citations
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This addresses security integration challenges for U.K. government digital services, though it is incremental as it adapts existing standards.

The study tackled the conflict between Agile software development and the Waterfall-based accreditation process in U.K. e-government services, resulting in a framework using OWASP ASVS to integrate security into Agile workflows and reduce delays.

This study examines the traditional approach to software development within the United Kingdom Government and the accreditation process. Initially we look at the Waterfall methodology that has been used for several years. We discuss the pros and cons of Waterfall before moving onto the Agile Scrum methodology. Agile has been adopted by the majority of Government digital departments including the Government Digital Services. Agile, despite its ability to achieve high rates of productivity organized in short, flexible, iterations, has faced security professionals disbelief when working within the U.K. Government. One of the major issues is that we develop in Agile but the accreditation process is conducted using Waterfall resulting in delays to go live dates. Taking a brief look into the accreditation process that is used within Government for I.T. systems and applications, we focus on giving the accreditor the assurance they need when developing new applications and systems. A framework has been produced by utilizing the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Application Security Verification Standard (ASVS). This framework will allow security and Agile to work side by side and produce secure code.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes