Minimizing Uncertainty through Sensor Placement with Angle Constraints
This addresses localization challenges in wireless sensor networks and tracking systems, offering improved approximations over standard methods, though it is incremental in algorithmic design.
The paper tackles the problem of sensor placement for localization by ensuring angular coverage between sensors and targets, introducing a framework that provides bi-criteria approximations with guarantees like O(log δ)-approximation for coverage close to α.
We study the problem of sensor placement in environments in which localization is a necessity, such as ad-hoc wireless sensor networks that allow the placement of a few anchors that know their location or sensor arrays that are tracking a target. In most of these situations, the quality of localization depends on the relative angle between the target and the pair of sensors observing it. In this paper, we consider placing a small number of sensors which ensure good angular $α$-coverage: given $α$ in $[0,π/2]$, for each target location $t$, there must be at least two sensors $s_1$ and $s_2$ such that the $\angle(s_1 t s_2)$ is in the interval $[α, π-α]$. One of the main difficulties encountered in such problems is that since the constraints depend on at least two sensors, building a solution must account for the inherent dependency between selected sensors, a feature that generic Set Cover techniques do not account for. We introduce a general framework that guarantees an angular coverage that is arbitrarily close to $α$ for any $α<= π/3$ and apply it to a variety of problems to get bi-criteria approximations. When the angular coverage is required to be at least a constant fraction of $α$, we obtain results that are strictly better than what standard geometric Set Cover methods give. When the angular coverage is required to be at least $(1-1/δ)\cdotα$, we obtain a $\mathcal{O}(\log δ)$- approximation for sensor placement with $α$-coverage on the plane. In the presence of additional distance or visibility constraints, the framework gives a $\mathcal{O}(\logδ\cdot\log k_{OPT})$-approximation, where $k_{OPT}$ is the size of the optimal solution. We also use our framework to give a $\mathcal{O}(\log δ)$-approximation that ensures $(1-1/δ)\cdot α$-coverage and covers every target within distance $3R$.