CRDSJul 20, 2016

Strong Hardness of Privacy from Weak Traitor Tracing

arXiv:1607.06141v19 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses the fundamental limits of differential privacy for researchers in cryptography and data privacy, providing strong hardness results that are incremental but tighten prior bounds.

The paper tackles the computational complexity of differentially private algorithms for answering statistical queries, showing that under a plausible assumption, no efficient algorithm exists if either the number of queries or the data universe is exponential in size and the other is at least roughly n^7, with results nearly matching known efficient algorithms for smaller scales.

Despite much study, the computational complexity of differential privacy remains poorly understood. In this paper we consider the computational complexity of accurately answering a family $Q$ of statistical queries over a data universe $X$ under differential privacy. A statistical query on a dataset $D \in X^n$ asks "what fraction of the elements of $D$ satisfy a given predicate $p$ on $X$?" Dwork et al. (STOC'09) and Boneh and Zhandry (CRYPTO'14) showed that if both $Q$ and $X$ are of polynomial size, then there is an efficient differentially private algorithm that accurately answers all the queries, and if both $Q$ and $X$ are exponential size, then under a plausible assumption, no efficient algorithm exists. We show that, under the same assumption, if either the number of queries or the data universe is of exponential size, and the other has size at least $\tilde{O}(n^7)$, then there is no differentially private algorithm that answers all the queries. In both cases, the result is nearly quantitatively tight, since there is an efficient differentially private algorithm that answers $\tildeΩ(n^2)$ queries on an exponential size data universe, and one that answers exponentially many queries on a data universe of size $\tildeΩ(n^2)$. Our proofs build on the connection between hardness results in differential privacy and traitor-tracing schemes (Dwork et al., STOC'09; Ullman, STOC'13). We prove our hardness result for a polynomial size query set (resp., data universe) by showing that they follow from the existence of a special type of traitor-tracing scheme with very short ciphertexts (resp., secret keys), but very weak security guarantees, and then constructing such a scheme.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes