SELGPLAug 31, 2016

Learning Syntactic Program Transformations from Examples

arXiv:1608.09000v1233 citationsHas Code
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the time-consuming task of manually extending transformation catalogs in IDEs and tutoring systems, offering an incremental improvement by automating transformation generation from examples.

The paper tackles the problem of automating program transformations by learning from example edits, presenting REFAZER, which synthesizes transformations to fix student submissions with 87% success on 720 students and learns intended transformations in 83% of cases from repetitive edits in open-source projects.

IDEs, such as Visual Studio, automate common transformations, such as Rename and Extract Method refactorings. However, extending these catalogs of transformations is complex and time-consuming. A similar phenomenon appears in intelligent tutoring systems where instructors have to write cumbersome code transformations that describe "common faults" to fix similar student submissions to programming assignments. We present REFAZER, a technique for automatically generating program transformations. REFAZER builds on the observation that code edits performed by developers can be used as examples for learning transformations. Example edits may share the same structure but involve different variables and subexpressions, which must be generalized in a transformation at the right level of abstraction. To learn transformations, REFAZER leverages state-of-the-art programming-by-example methodology using the following key components: (a) a novel domain-specific language (DSL) for describing program transformations, (b) domain-specific deductive algorithms for synthesizing transformations in the DSL, and (c) functions for ranking the synthesized transformations. We instantiate and evaluate REFAZER in two domains. First, given examples of edits used by students to fix incorrect programming assignment submissions, we learn transformations that can fix other students' submissions with similar faults. In our evaluation conducted on 4 programming tasks performed by 720 students, our technique helped to fix incorrect submissions for 87% of the students. In the second domain, we use repetitive edits applied by developers to the same project to synthesize a program transformation that applies these edits to other locations in the code. In our evaluation conducted on 59 scenarios of repetitive edits taken from 3 C# open-source projects, REFAZER learns the intended program transformation in 83% of the cases.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes