An Optimal Treatment Assignment Strategy to Evaluate Demand Response Effect
This work addresses a high-dimensional inference problem for electricity grid operators, offering a more efficient alternative to randomized assignment for demand response evaluation, though it is incremental as it builds on existing experimental design methods.
The paper tackles the problem of accurately estimating the impact of demand response signals on electricity consumption, which is challenging due to limited signals and many covariates, by proposing a tractable algorithm for optimal signal assignment that reduces estimation variance independently of covariate count, validated through simulations on synthetic data.
Demand response is designed to motivate electricity customers to modify their loads at critical time periods. The accurate estimation of impact of demand response signals to customers' consumption is central to any successful program. In practice, learning these response is nontrivial because operators can only send a limited number of signals. In addition, customer behavior also depends on a large number of exogenous covariates. These two features lead to a high dimensional inference problem with limited number of observations. In this paper, we formulate this problem by using a multivariate linear model and adopt an experimental design approach to estimate the impact of demand response signals. We show that randomized assignment, which is widely used to estimate the average treatment effect, is not efficient in reducing the variance of the estimator when a large number of covariates is present. In contrast, we present a tractable algorithm that strategically assigns demand response signals to customers. This algorithm achieves the optimal reduction in estimation variance, independent of the number of covariates. The results are validated from simulations on synthetic data.