NEAIDec 21, 2016

Difficulty Adjustable and Scalable Constrained Multi-objective Test Problem Toolkit

arXiv:1612.07603v3266 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This provides a benchmark for researchers in evolutionary computation to test and develop new constrained multi-objective optimization algorithms, though it is incremental as it builds on existing test problem frameworks.

The authors tackled the lack of constrained multi-objective optimization test problems by proposing a classification scheme with three difficulty types and developing a toolkit to create adjustable and scalable test problems, revealing that existing algorithms struggle to solve these problems efficiently.

Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) have progressed significantly in recent decades, but most of them are designed to solve unconstrained multi-objective optimization problems. In fact, many real-world multi-objective problems contain a number of constraints. To promote research on constrained multi-objective optimization, we first propose a problem classification scheme with three primary types of difficulty, which reflect various types of challenges presented by real-world optimization problems, in order to characterize the constraint functions in constrained multi-objective optimization problems (CMOPs). These are feasibility-hardness, convergence-hardness and diversity-hardness. We then develop a general toolkit to construct difficulty-adjustable and scalable CMOPs (DAS-CMOPs, or DAS-CMaOPs when the number of objectives is greater than three) with three types of parameterized constraint functions developed to capture the three proposed types of difficulty. Based on this toolkit, we suggest nine difficulty-adjustable and scalable CMOPs and nine CMaOPs. The experimental results reveal that mechanisms in MOEA/D-CDP may be more effective in solving convergence-hard DAS-CMOPs, while mechanisms of NSGA-II-CDP may be more effective in solving DAS-CMOPs with simultaneous diversity-, feasibility- and convergence-hardness. Mechanisms in C-NSGA-III may be more effective in solving feasibility-hard CMaOPs, while mechanisms of C-MOEA/DD may be more effective in solving CMaOPs with convergence-hardness. In addition, none of them can solve these problems efficiently, which stimulates us to continue to develop new CMOEAs and CMaOEAs to solve the suggested DAS-CMOPs and DAS-CMaOPs.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes