DSCRFeb 9, 2017

The Price of Selection in Differential Privacy

arXiv:1702.02970v135 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses a fundamental data requirement gap in privacy-preserving machine learning for statisticians and data analysts, providing a tight bound on the price of selection under differential privacy.

The paper tackles the differentially private top-k selection problem, proving a matching lower bound that a dataset size of n ≳ k ln(d) is necessary for high-accuracy selection, showing it requires more data than just estimating the values of those columns.

In the differentially private top-$k$ selection problem, we are given a dataset $X \in \{\pm 1\}^{n \times d}$, in which each row belongs to an individual and each column corresponds to some binary attribute, and our goal is to find a set of $k \ll d$ columns whose means are approximately as large as possible. Differential privacy requires that our choice of these $k$ columns does not depend too much on any on individual's dataset. This problem can be solved using the well known exponential mechanism and composition properties of differential privacy. In the high-accuracy regime, where we require the error of the selection procedure to be to be smaller than the so-called sampling error $α\approx \sqrt{\ln(d)/n}$, this procedure succeeds given a dataset of size $n \gtrsim k \ln(d)$. We prove a matching lower bound, showing that a dataset of size $n \gtrsim k \ln(d)$ is necessary for private top-$k$ selection in this high-accuracy regime. Our lower bound is the first to show that selecting the $k$ largest columns requires more data than simply estimating the value of those $k$ columns, which can be done using a dataset of size just $n \gtrsim k$.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes