LGHCFeb 28, 2017

Progress Estimation and Phase Detection for Sequential Processes

arXiv:1702.08623v320 citations
AI Analysis

This addresses the need for real-time progress estimation in domains like medical processes and sports events, offering a novel approach but with incremental improvements in specific applications.

The paper tackled the problem of sensor-based detection of process progress by introducing a real-time system for modeling, recognizing, and estimating progress in sequential processes, achieving phase detection accuracies of over 86% for trauma resuscitation and 88% for Olympic swimming, with completeness estimation errors under 12.6% and 6.3%, respectively.

Process modeling and understanding are fundamental for advanced human-computer interfaces and automation systems. Most recent research has focused on activity recognition, but little has been done on sensor-based detection of process progress. We introduce a real-time, sensor-based system for modeling, recognizing and estimating the progress of a work process. We implemented a multimodal deep learning structure to extract the relevant spatio-temporal features from multiple sensory inputs and used a novel deep regression structure for overall completeness estimation. Using process completeness estimation with a Gaussian mixture model, our system can predict the phase for sequential processes. The performance speed, calculated using completeness estimation, allows online estimation of the remaining time. To train our system, we introduced a novel rectified hyperbolic tangent (rtanh) activation function and conditional loss. Our system was tested on data obtained from the medical process (trauma resuscitation) and sports events (Olympic swimming competition). Our system outperformed the existing trauma-resuscitation phase detectors with a phase detection accuracy of over 86%, an F1-score of 0.67, a completeness estimation error of under 12.6%, and a remaining-time estimation error of less than 7.5 minutes. For the Olympic swimming dataset, our system achieved an accuracy of 88%, an F1-score of 0.58, a completeness estimation error of 6.3% and a remaining-time estimation error of 2.9 minutes.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes