CVMar 21, 2017

Proposal Flow: Semantic Correspondences from Object Proposals

arXiv:1703.07144v1151 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the challenge of semantic image matching for computer vision applications, representing an incremental improvement over existing semantic flow methods.

The paper tackles the problem of finding semantic correspondences between images with intra-class variations and layout changes by introducing proposal flow, which uses object proposals instead of pixels or regular regions. The method significantly outperforms existing semantic flow techniques on new and standard datasets.

Finding image correspondences remains a challenging problem in the presence of intra-class variations and large changes in scene layout. Semantic flow methods are designed to handle images depicting different instances of the same object or scene category. We introduce a novel approach to semantic flow, dubbed proposal flow, that establishes reliable correspondences using object proposals. Unlike prevailing semantic flow approaches that operate on pixels or regularly sampled local regions, proposal flow benefits from the characteristics of modern object proposals, that exhibit high repeatability at multiple scales, and can take advantage of both local and geometric consistency constraints among proposals. We also show that the corresponding sparse proposal flow can effectively be transformed into a conventional dense flow field. We introduce two new challenging datasets that can be used to evaluate both general semantic flow techniques and region-based approaches such as proposal flow. We use these benchmarks to compare different matching algorithms, object proposals, and region features within proposal flow, to the state of the art in semantic flow. This comparison, along with experiments on standard datasets, demonstrates that proposal flow significantly outperforms existing semantic flow methods in various settings.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes