IRMay 9, 2017

WikiM: Metapaths based Wikification of Scientific Abstracts

arXiv:1705.03264v15 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses the need to connect scientific publications to Wikipedia for easier reading and better article quality, though it appears incremental as it builds on existing wikification methods with network enhancements.

The paper tackles the problem of wikifying scientific abstracts by linking concepts to Wikipedia entries, presenting WikiM, a metapath-based method that outperforms state-of-the-art techniques with precision values of 72.42% for mention extraction and 73.8% for entity linking on an ACL Anthology dataset.

In order to disseminate the exponential extent of knowledge being produced in the form of scientific publications, it would be best to design mechanisms that connect it with already existing rich repository of concepts -- the Wikipedia. Not only does it make scientific reading simple and easy (by connecting the involved concepts used in the scientific articles to their Wikipedia explanations) but also improves the overall quality of the article. In this paper, we present a novel metapath based method, WikiM, to efficiently wikify scientific abstracts -- a topic that has been rarely investigated in the literature. One of the prime motivations for this work comes from the observation that, wikified abstracts of scientific documents help a reader to decide better, in comparison to the plain abstracts, whether (s)he would be interested to read the full article. We perform mention extraction mostly through traditional tf-idf measures coupled with a set of smart filters. The entity linking heavily leverages on the rich citation and author publication networks. Our observation is that various metapaths defined over these networks can significantly enhance the overall performance of the system. For mention extraction and entity linking, we outperform most of the competing state-of-the-art techniques by a large margin arriving at precision values of 72.42% and 73.8% respectively over a dataset from the ACL Anthology Network. In order to establish the robustness of our scheme, we wikify three other datasets and get precision values of 63.41%-94.03% and 67.67%-73.29% respectively for the mention extraction and the entity linking phase.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes