AILGMLMay 22, 2017

A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions

arXiv:1705.07874v235291 citations
Originality Highly original
AI Analysis

This addresses the need for interpretability in machine learning, particularly for users of complex models, by providing a foundational approach that bridges accuracy and explainability.

The paper tackles the problem of interpreting predictions from complex models like deep learning by proposing SHAP, a unified framework that assigns feature importance values, unifying six existing methods and showing improved computational performance and consistency with human intuition.

Understanding why a model makes a certain prediction can be as crucial as the prediction's accuracy in many applications. However, the highest accuracy for large modern datasets is often achieved by complex models that even experts struggle to interpret, such as ensemble or deep learning models, creating a tension between accuracy and interpretability. In response, various methods have recently been proposed to help users interpret the predictions of complex models, but it is often unclear how these methods are related and when one method is preferable over another. To address this problem, we present a unified framework for interpreting predictions, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations). SHAP assigns each feature an importance value for a particular prediction. Its novel components include: (1) the identification of a new class of additive feature importance measures, and (2) theoretical results showing there is a unique solution in this class with a set of desirable properties. The new class unifies six existing methods, notable because several recent methods in the class lack the proposed desirable properties. Based on insights from this unification, we present new methods that show improved computational performance and/or better consistency with human intuition than previous approaches.

Code Implementations17 repos

Data from Papers with Code (CC-BY-SA-4.0)

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes