On Optimistic versus Randomized Exploration in Reinforcement Learning
This addresses the exploration-exploitation trade-off in RL, offering insights for algorithm design, though it is incremental in analyzing existing methods.
The paper compares optimistic and randomized exploration in reinforcement learning, finding that randomized approaches can be more statistically efficient based on computational experience and analytic examples.
We discuss the relative merits of optimistic and randomized approaches to exploration in reinforcement learning. Optimistic approaches presented in the literature apply an optimistic boost to the value estimate at each state-action pair and select actions that are greedy with respect to the resulting optimistic value function. Randomized approaches sample from among statistically plausible value functions and select actions that are greedy with respect to the random sample. Prior computational experience suggests that randomized approaches can lead to far more statistically efficient learning. We present two simple analytic examples that elucidate why this is the case. In principle, there should be optimistic approaches that fare well relative to randomized approaches, but that would require intractable computation. Optimistic approaches that have been proposed in the literature sacrifice statistical efficiency for the sake of computational efficiency. Randomized approaches, on the other hand, may enable simultaneous statistical and computational efficiency.