NEJul 15, 2017

Quantum Computation via Sparse Distributed Representation

arXiv:1707.05660v16 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the challenge of simulating quantum computing efficiently for researchers in quantum theory and computing, though it appears incremental as it builds on existing SDR methods.

The paper tackles the problem of representing quantum superposition classically by proposing sparse distributed representations (SDR) to encode probability amplitudes, enabling exponential state representation with linear resources. It claims that this approach can achieve quantum speed-up on classical hardware without specialized equipment.

Quantum superposition says that any physical system simultaneously exists in all of its possible states, the number of which is exponential in the number of entities composing the system. The strength of presence of each possible state in the superposition, i.e., its probability of being observed, is represented by its probability amplitude coefficient. The assumption that these coefficients must be represented physically disjointly from each other, i.e., localistically, is nearly universal in the quantum theory/computing literature. Alternatively, these coefficients can be represented using sparse distributed representations (SDR), wherein each coefficient is represented by small subset of an overall population of units, and the subsets can overlap. Specifically, I consider an SDR model in which the overall population consists of Q WTA clusters, each with K binary units. Each coefficient is represented by a set of Q units, one per cluster. Thus, K^Q coefficients can be represented with KQ units. Thus, the particular world state, X, whose coefficient's representation, R(X), is the set of Q units active at time t has the max probability and the probability of every other state, Y_i, at time t, is measured by R(Y_i)'s intersection with R(X). Thus, R(X) simultaneously represents both the particular state, X, and the probability distribution over all states. Thus, set intersection may be used to classically implement quantum superposition. If algorithms exist for which the time it takes to store (learn) new representations and to find the closest-matching stored representation (probabilistic inference) remains constant as additional representations are stored, this meets the criterion of quantum computing. Such an algorithm has already been described: it achieves this "quantum speed-up" without esoteric hardware, and in fact, on a single-processor, classical (Von Neumann) computer.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes