From dissipativity theory to compositional synthesis of symbolic models
For control theorists and engineers, this provides a compositional method to build symbolic models of large-scale networked systems, reducing complexity in verification and synthesis.
This paper introduces a compositional framework for constructing finite abstractions (symbolic models) of interconnected discrete-time control systems using dissipativity-type properties. The approach enables compositional error quantification and abstraction construction for incrementally passivable systems, demonstrated on a network of linear systems without restrictions on subsystem gains or count.
In this work, we introduce a compositional framework for the construction of finite abstractions (a.k.a. symbolic models) of interconnected discrete-time control systems. The compositional scheme is based on the joint dissipativity-type properties of discrete-time control subsystems and their finite abstractions. In the first part of the paper, we use a notion of so-called storage function as a relation between each subsystem and its finite abstraction to construct compositionally a notion of so-called simulation function as a relation between interconnected finite abstractions and that of control systems. The derived simulation function is used to quantify the error between the output behavior of the overall interconnected concrete system and that of its finite abstraction. In the second part of the paper, we propose a technique to construct finite abstractions together with their corresponding storage functions for a class of discrete-time control systems under some incremental passivity property. We show that if a discrete-time control system is so-called incrementally passivable, then one can construct its finite abstraction by a suitable quantization of the input and state sets together with the corresponding storage function. Finally, the proposed results are illustrated by constructing a finite abstraction of a network of linear discrete-time control systems and its corresponding simulation function in a compositional way. The compositional conditions in this example do not impose any restriction on the gains or the number of the subsystems which, in particular, elucidates the effectiveness of dissipativity-type compositional reasoning for networks of systems.