CLAIOct 17, 2017

Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents

arXiv:1710.06481v21377 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the limitation of existing reading comprehension methods that rely on single-document evidence, providing a resource to train and test multi-hop inference capabilities, though it is incremental as it builds on prior datasets and models.

The paper tackles the problem of enabling models to answer questions requiring evidence from multiple documents by constructing datasets for multi-hop reading comprehension, resulting in models achieving up to 42.9% accuracy compared to human performance at 74.0%.

Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine comprehension methods, but currently there exist no resources to train and test this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence - effectively performing multi-hop (alias multi-step) inference. We devise a methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However, both models struggle to select relevant information, as providing documents guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 42.9% compared to human performance at 74.0% - leaving ample room for improvement.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes