RONov 1, 2017

This robot stinks! Differences between perceived mistreatment of robot and computer partners

arXiv:1711.00561v16 citations
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This addresses how people perceive robots in social interactions, which is incremental for understanding human-robot collaboration.

The study investigated whether people perceive mistreatment differently towards a robot versus a computer in a collaborative setting, finding that participants observed mistreatment and felt more sympathy for the robot, with significant differences in perceived emotional capability.

Robots (and computers) are increasingly being used in scenarios where they interact socially with people. How people react to these agents is telling about the perceived animacy of such agents. Mistreatment of robots (or computers) by co-workers might provoke such telling reactions. The purpose of this study was to discover if people perceived mistreatment directed towards a robot any differently than toward a computer. This will provide some understanding of how people perceive robots in collaborative social settings. We conducted a between-subjects study with 80 participants. Participants worked cooperatively with either a robot or a computer which acted as the "recorder" for the group. A confederate either acted aggressively or neutrally towards the "recorder." We hypothesized that people would not socially accept mistreatment towards an agent that they felt was intelligent and similar to themselves; that participants would perceive the robot as more similar in appearance and emotional capability to themselves than a computer; and would observe more mistreatment. The final results supported our hypothesis; the participants observed mistreatment in the robot, but not the computer. Participants felt significantly more sympathetic towards the robot and also believed that it was much more emotionally capable.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes