On Communication Complexity of Classification Problems
This work addresses communication efficiency in distributed learning, offering foundational insights that could impact all of ML/AI, though it is incremental in building on Yao's model and existing theory.
The paper tackles the problem of distributed learning in a two-party communication model, providing combinatorial characterizations for classes that can be learned with efficient communication, which leads to unconditional separations between different learning contexts like realizable vs. agnostic learning.
This work studies distributed learning in the spirit of Yao's model of communication complexity: consider a two-party setting, where each of the players gets a list of labelled examples and they communicate in order to jointly perform some learning task. To naturally fit into the framework of learning theory, the players can send each other examples (as well as bits) where each example/bit costs one unit of communication. This enables a uniform treatment of infinite classes such as half-spaces in $\mathbb{R}^d$, which are ubiquitous in machine learning. We study several fundamental questions in this model. For example, we provide combinatorial characterizations of the classes that can be learned with efficient communication in the proper-case as well as in the improper-case. These findings imply unconditional separations between various learning contexts, e.g.\ realizable versus agnostic learning, proper versus improper learning, etc. The derivation of these results hinges on a type of decision problems we term "{\it realizability problems}" where the goal is deciding whether a distributed input sample is consistent with an hypothesis from a pre-specified class. From a technical perspective, the protocols we use are based on ideas from machine learning theory and the impossibility results are based on ideas from communication complexity theory.