MMNov 26, 2017

JPEG Steganalysis Based on DenseNet

arXiv:1711.09335v332 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses steganalysis for JPEG images, offering improved detection accuracy with fewer parameters, though it appears incremental as it builds on existing CNN and conventional methods.

The paper tackles the problem of detecting hidden information in JPEG images (steganalysis) by proposing a 32-layer CNN architecture that improves feature reuse and reduces parameters, and an ensemble method combining CNN with conventional techniques. Results show reductions in detection error rates by up to 8.06% compared to state-of-the-art methods while using only 17% of the parameters of a baseline.

Different from the conventional deep learning work based on an images content in computer vision, deep steganalysis is an art to detect the secret information embedded in an image via deep learning, pose challenge of detection weak information invisible hidden in a host image thus learning in a very low signal-to-noise (SNR) case. In this paper, we propose a 32- layer convolutional neural Networks (CNNs) in to improve the efficiency of preprocess and reuse the features by concatenating all features from the previous layers with the same feature- map size, thus improve the flow of information and gradient. The shared features and bottleneck layers further improve the feature propagation and reduce the CNN model parameters dramatically. Experimental results on the BOSSbase, BOWS2 and ImageNet datasets have showed that the proposed CNN architecture can improve the performance and enhance the robustness. To further boost the detection accuracy, an ensemble architecture called as CNN-SCA-GFR is proposed, CNN-SCA- GFR is also the first work to combine the CNN architecture and conventional method in the JPEG domain. Experiments show that it can further lower detection errors. Compared with the state-of-the-art method XuNet [1] on BOSSbase, the proposed CNN-SCA-GFR architecture can reduce detection error rate by 5.67% for 0.1 bpnzAC and by 4.41% for 0.4 bpnzAC while the number of training parameters in CNN is only 17% of what used by XuNet. It also decreases the detection errors from the conventional method SCA-GFR by 7.89% for 0.1 bpnzAC and 8.06% for 0.4 bpnzAC, respectively.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes