LGCLMLJan 2, 2018

Character-level Recurrent Neural Networks in Practice: Comparing Training and Sampling Schemes

arXiv:1801.00632v28 citations
AI Analysis

This work addresses practical implementation issues for researchers and practitioners using RNNs, but it is incremental as it focuses on comparing existing schemes rather than introducing new methods.

The paper compared various training and sampling schemes for character-level recurrent neural networks in next-token prediction, finding that the choice involves trade-offs in stability, time, performance, and effort, with hidden state transfer often causing unstable training.

Recurrent neural networks are nowadays successfully used in an abundance of applications, going from text, speech and image processing to recommender systems. Backpropagation through time is the algorithm that is commonly used to train these networks on specific tasks. Many deep learning frameworks have their own implementation of training and sampling procedures for recurrent neural networks, while there are in fact multiple other possibilities to choose from and other parameters to tune. In existing literature this is very often overlooked or ignored. In this paper we therefore give an overview of possible training and sampling schemes for character-level recurrent neural networks to solve the task of predicting the next token in a given sequence. We test these different schemes on a variety of datasets, neural network architectures and parameter settings, and formulate a number of take-home recommendations. The choice of training and sampling scheme turns out to be subject to a number of trade-offs, such as training stability, sampling time, model performance and implementation effort, but is largely independent of the data. Perhaps the most surprising result is that transferring hidden states for correctly initializing the model on subsequences often leads to unstable training behavior depending on the dataset.

Code Implementations2 repos
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes