CRDSLGFeb 7, 2018

Tight Lower Bounds for Locally Differentially Private Selection

arXiv:1802.02638v242 citations
AI Analysis

This provides foundational insights into privacy-utility trade-offs in local differential privacy, with implications for algorithm design in machine learning.

The paper proves tight lower bounds on sample complexity for non-interactive local differentially private protocols optimizing linear functions over the simplex, showing exponential dependence on dimension compared to central models.

We prove a tight lower bound (up to constant factors) on the sample complexity of any non-interactive local differentially private protocol for optimizing a linear function over the simplex. This lower bound also implies a tight lower bound (again, up to constant factors) on the sample complexity of any non-interactive local differentially private protocol implementing the exponential mechanism. These results reveal that any local protocol for these problems has exponentially worse dependence on the dimension than corresponding algorithms in the central model. Previously, Kasiviswanathan et al. (FOCS 2008) proved an exponential separation between local and central model algorithms for PAC learning the class of parity functions. In contrast, our lower bound are quantitatively tight, apply to a simple and natural class of linear optimization problems, and our techniques are arguably simpler.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes