NELGMLMar 19, 2018

Deep learning improved by biological activation functions

arXiv:1804.11237v27 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses the need for more efficient and effective activation functions in deep learning, offering a biologically inspired alternative that could enhance training speed and model generalization, though it appears incremental as it builds on existing activation function research.

The paper tackled the problem of improving deep learning by introducing bionodal root unit (BRU) activation functions, which are more biologically plausible than common functions like ReLU, and demonstrated that BRU networks train faster and achieve better generalization on datasets like MNIST and CIFAR-10/100, with concrete performance gains in loss and error measurements.

`Biologically inspired' activation functions, such as the logistic sigmoid, have been instrumental in the historical advancement of machine learning. However in the field of deep learning, they have been largely displaced by rectified linear units (ReLU) or similar functions, such as its exponential linear unit (ELU) variant, to mitigate the effects of vanishing gradients associated with error back-propagation. The logistic sigmoid however does not represent the true input-output relation in neuronal cells under physiological conditions. Here, bionodal root unit (BRU) activation functions are introduced, exhibiting input-output non-linearities that are substantially more biologically plausible since their functional form is based on known biophysical properties of neuronal cells. In order to evaluate the learning performance of BRU activations, deep networks are constructed with identical architectures except differing in their transfer functions (ReLU, ELU, and BRU). Multilayer perceptrons, stacked auto-encoders, and convolutional networks are used to test supervised and unsupervised learning based on the MNIST and CIFAR-10/100 datasets. Comparisons of learning performance, quantified using loss and error measurements, demonstrate that bionodal networks both train faster than their ReLU and ELU counterparts and result in the best generalised models even in the absence of formal regularisation. These results therefore suggest that revisiting the detailed properties of biological neurones and their circuitry might prove invaluable in the field of deep learning for the future.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes