Facing Multiple Attacks in Adversarial Patrolling Games with Alarmed Targets
This work addresses security and resource allocation in adversarial scenarios like surveillance or cybersecurity, but it is incremental as it builds on existing patrolling game models by incorporating multiple attacks and alarmed targets.
The paper tackles the problem of computing equilibrium strategies in adversarial patrolling games on graphs with alarmed targets and multiple attacker resources, showing NP-hardness when resources are free but poly-time solvability when fixed, and providing a dynamic programming algorithm. It also analyzes defender strategy robustness to errors in estimating attacker resources and demonstrates that randomized online algorithms achieve a competitive factor twice better than deterministic ones.
We focus on adversarial patrolling games on arbitrary graphs, where the Defender can control a mobile resource, the targets are alarmed by an alarm system, and the Attacker can observe the actions of the mobile resource of the Defender and perform different attacks exploiting multiple resources. This scenario can be modeled as a zero-sum extensive-form game in which each player can play multiple times. The game tree is exponentially large both in the size of the graph and in the number of attacking resources. We show that when the number of the Attacker's resources is free, the problem of computing the equilibrium path is NP-hard, while when the number of resources is fixed, the equilibrium path can be computed in poly-time. We provide a dynamic-programming algorithm that, given the number of the Attacker's resources, computes the equilibrium path requiring poly-time in the size of the graph and exponential time in the number of the resources. Furthermore, since in real-world scenarios it is implausible that the Defender knows the number of attacking resources, we study the robustness of the Defender's strategy when she makes a wrong guess about that number. We show that even the error of just a single resource can lead to an arbitrary inefficiency, when the inefficiency is defined as the ratio of the Defender's utilities obtained with a wrong guess and a correct guess. However, a more suitable definition of inefficiency is given by the difference of the Defender's utilities: this way, we observe that the higher the error in the estimation, the higher the loss for the Defender. Then, we investigate the performance of online algorithms when no information about the Attacker's resources is available. Finally, we resort to randomized online algorithms showing that we can obtain a competitive factor that is twice better than the one that can be achieved by any deterministic online algorithm.