An Improved Generic Bet-and-Run Strategy for Speeding Up Stochastic Local Search
This work addresses optimization efficiency for algorithm designers, but it is incremental, building on existing Bet-and-Run approaches.
The paper tackles the problem of efficiently allocating a fixed time budget for stochastic local search algorithms by proposing an improved generic Bet-and-Run strategy that uses advanced decision makers to select promising runs, showing it can yield better results than previous methods in extensive experiments.
A commonly used strategy for improving optimization algorithms is to restart the algorithm when it is believed to be trapped in an inferior part of the search space. Building on the recent success of Bet-and-Run approaches for restarted local search solvers, we introduce an improved generic Bet-and-Run strategy. The goal is to obtain the best possible results within a given time budget t using a given black-box optimization algorithm. If no prior knowledge about problem features and algorithm behavior is available, the question about how to use the time budget most efficiently arises. We propose to first start k>=1 independent runs of the algorithm during an initialization budget t1<t, pausing these runs, then apply a decision maker D to choose 1<=m<=k runs from them (consuming t2>=0 time units in doing so), and then continuing these runs for the remaining t3=t-t1-t2 time units. In previous Bet-and-Run strategies, the decision maker D=currentBest would simply select the run with the best- so-far results at negligible time. We propose using more advanced methods to discriminate between "good" and "bad" sample runs, with the goal of increasing the correlation of the chosen run with the a-posteriori best one. We test several different approaches, including neural networks trained or polynomials fitted on the current trace of the algorithm to predict which run may yield the best results if granted the remaining budget. We show with extensive experiments that this approach can yield better results than the previous methods, but also find that the currentBest method is a very reliable and robust baseline approach.