Estimating Failure in Brittle Materials using Graph Theory
This provides a practical solution for engineers and researchers in materials science who need efficient upscaling and uncertainty quantification in brittle fracture applications, though it is incremental as it builds on existing theories and methods.
The paper tackles the problem of computationally intensive high-fidelity models for brittle fracture by developing fast heuristics to estimate failure paths and damage, achieving over 90% prediction accuracy and being about 1,000,000 times faster than the high-fidelity model.
In brittle fracture applications, failure paths, regions where the failure occurs and damage statistics, are some of the key quantities of interest (QoI). High-fidelity models for brittle failure that accurately predict these QoI exist but are highly computationally intensive, making them infeasible to incorporate in upscaling and uncertainty quantification frameworks. The goal of this paper is to provide a fast heuristic to reasonably estimate quantities such as failure path and damage in the process of brittle failure. Towards this goal, we first present a method to predict failure paths under tensile loading conditions and low-strain rates. The method uses a $k$-nearest neighbors algorithm built on fracture process zone theory, and identifies the set of all possible pre-existing cracks that are likely to join early to form a large crack. The method then identifies zone of failure and failure paths using weighted graphs algorithms. We compare these failure paths to those computed with a high-fidelity model called the Hybrid Optimization Software Simulation Suite (HOSS). A probabilistic evolution model for average damage in a system is also developed that is trained using 150 HOSS simulations and tested on 40 simulations. A non-parametric approach based on confidence intervals is used to determine the damage evolution over time along the dominant failure path. For upscaling, damage is the key QoI needed as an input by the continuum models. This needs to be informed accurately by the surrogate models for calculating effective modulii at continuum-scale. We show that for the proposed average damage evolution model, the prediction accuracy on the test data is more than 90\%. In terms of the computational time, the proposed models are $\approx \mathcal{O}(10^6)$ times faster compared to high-fidelity HOSS.