Learning Optimal Fair Policies
It addresses fairness in automated decision-making for sensitive domains such as criminal justice, building incrementally on prior work.
The paper tackles the problem of learning optimal decision policies that correct for unfair dependence on sensitive attributes like gender or race, using causal inference and constrained optimization to ensure fairness constraints are satisfied, with theoretical guarantees and validation on synthetic and real criminal justice data.
Systematic discriminatory biases present in our society influence the way data is collected and stored, the way variables are defined, and the way scientific findings are put into practice as policy. Automated decision procedures and learning algorithms applied to such data may serve to perpetuate existing injustice or unfairness in our society. In this paper, we consider how to make optimal but fair decisions, which "break the cycle of injustice" by correcting for the unfair dependence of both decisions and outcomes on sensitive features (e.g., variables that correspond to gender, race, disability, or other protected attributes). We use methods from causal inference and constrained optimization to learn optimal policies in a way that addresses multiple potential biases which afflict data analysis in sensitive contexts, extending the approach of (Nabi and Shpitser 2018). Our proposal comes equipped with the theoretical guarantee that the chosen fair policy will induce a joint distribution for new instances that satisfies given fairness constraints. We illustrate our approach with both synthetic data and real criminal justice data.