CRAIOct 10, 2018

Towards Differentially Private Truth Discovery for Crowd Sensing Systems

arXiv:1810.04760v136 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses privacy concerns for participants in crowd sensing systems, offering a practical solution where existing methods fail, though it is incremental in applying differential privacy to a specific domain.

The paper tackles the problem of protecting individual user privacy in crowd sensing systems while performing truth discovery, and proposes a mechanism that satisfies local differential privacy while maintaining high aggregation accuracy, with formal utility-privacy trade-off quantification and experimental validation.

Nowadays, crowd sensing becomes increasingly more popular due to the ubiquitous usage of mobile devices. However, the quality of such human-generated sensory data varies significantly among different users. To better utilize sensory data, the problem of truth discovery, whose goal is to estimate user quality and infer reliable aggregated results through quality-aware data aggregation, has emerged as a hot topic. Although the existing truth discovery approaches can provide reliable aggregated results, they fail to protect the private information of individual users. Moreover, crowd sensing systems typically involve a large number of participants, making encryption or secure multi-party computation based solutions difficult to deploy. To address these challenges, in this paper, we propose an efficient privacy-preserving truth discovery mechanism with theoretical guarantees of both utility and privacy. The key idea of the proposed mechanism is to perturb data from each user independently and then conduct weighted aggregation among users' perturbed data. The proposed approach is able to assign user weights based on information quality, and thus the aggregated results will not deviate much from the true results even when large noise is added. We adapt local differential privacy definition to this privacy-preserving task and demonstrate the proposed mechanism can satisfy local differential privacy while preserving high aggregation accuracy. We formally quantify utility and privacy trade-off and further verify the claim by experiments on both synthetic data and a real-world crowd sensing system.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes