Pareto Optimization for Subset Selection with Dynamic Cost Constraints
This addresses the problem of maintaining solution quality in dynamic environments for researchers in submodular optimization, though it appears incremental as it builds on existing Pareto optimization methods.
The paper tackles the subset selection problem with dynamic cost constraints, showing that the Pareto optimization approach (POMC) efficiently computes a φ-approximation for each constraint bound and adapts quickly to increases, outperforming greedy algorithms in influence maximization experiments.
We consider the subset selection problem for function $f$ with constraint bound $B$ that changes over time. Within the area of submodular optimization, various greedy approaches are commonly used. For dynamic environments we observe that the adaptive variants of these greedy approaches are not able to maintain their approximation quality. Investigating the recently introduced POMC Pareto optimization approach, we show that this algorithm efficiently computes a $φ= (α_f/2)(1-\frac{1}{e^{α_f}})$-approximation, where $α_f$ is the submodularity ratio of $f$, for each possible constraint bound $b \leq B$. Furthermore, we show that POMC is able to adapt its set of solutions quickly in the case that $B$ increases. Our experimental investigations for the influence maximization in social networks show the advantage of POMC over generalized greedy algorithms. We also consider EAMC, a new evolutionary algorithm with polynomial expected time guarantee to maintain $φ$ approximation ratio, and NSGA-II with two different population sizes as advanced multi-objective optimization algorithm, to demonstrate their challenges in optimizing the maximum coverage problem. Our empirical analysis shows that, within the same number of evaluations, POMC is able to perform as good as NSGA-II under linear constraint, while EAMC performs significantly worse than all considered algorithms in most cases.