Sequential Experiment Design for Hypothesis Verification
This work addresses hypothesis verification for applications like target localization and clinical trials, presenting an incremental improvement with a new heuristic strategy.
The paper tackles the verification phase in active hypothesis testing by formulating it as a confidence maximization problem in a POMDP setting, proposing a heuristic adaptive strategy based on Kullback-Leibler divergences, and demonstrates through numerical experiments that this heuristic outperforms existing methods in some scenarios.
Hypothesis testing is an important problem with applications in target localization, clinical trials etc. Many active hypothesis testing strategies operate in two phases: an exploration phase and a verification phase. In the exploration phase, selection of experiments is such that a moderate level of confidence on the true hypothesis is achieved. Subsequent experiment design aims at improving the confidence level on this hypothesis to the desired level. In this paper, the focus is on the verification phase. A confidence measure is defined and active hypothesis testing is formulated as a confidence maximization problem in an infinite-horizon average-reward Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) setting. The problem of maximizing confidence conditioned on a particular hypothesis is referred to as the hypothesis verification problem. The relationship between hypothesis testing and verification problems is established. The verification problem can be formulated as a Markov Decision Process (MDP). Optimal solutions for the verification MDP are characterized and a simple heuristic adaptive strategy for verification is proposed based on a zero-sum game interpretation of Kullback-Leibler divergences. It is demonstrated through numerical experiments that the heuristic performs better in some scenarios compared to existing methods in literature.