Can VAEs Generate Novel Examples?
This addresses a fundamental limitation in generative modeling for machine learning researchers, revealing that VAEs may not inherently produce novel outputs, which is incremental but clarifies theoretical expectations.
The paper investigates whether variational autoencoders (VAEs) can generate novel examples beyond the training data, finding that high-capacity VAEs essentially perform nearest-neighbor matching in latent space, limiting novelty, while lower-dimensional parameterizations show some advantage for unseen classes.
An implicit goal in works on deep generative models is that such models should be able to generate novel examples that were not previously seen in the training data. In this paper, we investigate to what extent this property holds for widely employed variational autoencoder (VAE) architectures. VAEs maximize a lower bound on the log marginal likelihood, which implies that they will in principle overfit the training data when provided with a sufficiently expressive decoder. In the limit of an infinite capacity decoder, the optimal generative model is a uniform mixture over the training data. More generally, an optimal decoder should output a weighted average over the examples in the training data, where the magnitude of the weights is determined by the proximity in the latent space. This leads to the hypothesis that, for a sufficiently high capacity encoder and decoder, the VAE decoder will perform nearest-neighbor matching according to the coordinates in the latent space. To test this hypothesis, we investigate generalization on the MNIST dataset. We consider both generalization to new examples of previously seen classes, and generalization to the classes that were withheld from the training set. In both cases, we find that reconstructions are closely approximated by nearest neighbors for higher-dimensional parameterizations. When generalizing to unseen classes however, lower-dimensional parameterizations offer a clear advantage.