MLCRCVLGJan 15, 2019

The Limitations of Adversarial Training and the Blind-Spot Attack

arXiv:1901.04684v1159 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This reveals a critical limitation in adversarial defenses for deep learning security, impacting practitioners relying on these methods for robust models.

The paper identifies that adversarial training's effectiveness correlates with test points' distance from the training data manifold, making it vulnerable to 'blind-spot attacks' on low-density regions, and demonstrates this with examples like scaling MNIST images, showing it affects large datasets like CIFAR and ImageNet due to dimensionality and data scarcity.

The adversarial training procedure proposed by Madry et al. (2018) is one of the most effective methods to defend against adversarial examples in deep neural networks (DNNs). In our paper, we shed some lights on the practicality and the hardness of adversarial training by showing that the effectiveness (robustness on test set) of adversarial training has a strong correlation with the distance between a test point and the manifold of training data embedded by the network. Test examples that are relatively far away from this manifold are more likely to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Consequentially, an adversarial training based defense is susceptible to a new class of attacks, the "blind-spot attack", where the input images reside in "blind-spots" (low density regions) of the empirical distribution of training data but is still on the ground-truth data manifold. For MNIST, we found that these blind-spots can be easily found by simply scaling and shifting image pixel values. Most importantly, for large datasets with high dimensional and complex data manifold (CIFAR, ImageNet, etc), the existence of blind-spots in adversarial training makes defending on any valid test examples difficult due to the curse of dimensionality and the scarcity of training data. Additionally, we find that blind-spots also exist on provable defenses including (Wong & Kolter, 2018) and (Sinha et al., 2018) because these trainable robustness certificates can only be practically optimized on a limited set of training data.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes