Hedging the Drift: Learning to Optimize under Non-Stationarity
This addresses the challenge of optimizing in changing environments for applications like online advertising and pricing, representing a novel method for a known bottleneck rather than a foundational breakthrough.
The paper tackles the problem of decision-making in non-stationary bandit settings, such as advertisement allocation and dynamic pricing, by introducing algorithms that achieve state-of-the-art dynamic regret bounds, with extensive experiments showing superior empirical performance on synthetic and real-world datasets.
We introduce data-driven decision-making algorithms that achieve state-of-the-art \emph{dynamic regret} bounds for non-stationary bandit settings. These settings capture applications such as advertisement allocation, dynamic pricing, and traffic network routing in changing environments. We show how the difficulty posed by the (unknown \emph{a priori} and possibly adversarial) non-stationarity can be overcome by an unconventional marriage between stochastic and adversarial bandit learning algorithms. Our main contribution is a general algorithmic recipe for a wide variety of non-stationary bandit problems. Specifically, we design and analyze the sliding window-upper confidence bound algorithm that achieves the optimal dynamic regret bound for each of the settings when we know the respective underlying \emph{variation budget}, which quantifies the total amount of temporal variation of the latent environments. Boosted by the novel bandit-over-bandit framework that adapts to the latent changes, we can further enjoy the (nearly) optimal dynamic regret bounds in a (surprisingly) parameter-free manner. In addition to the classical exploration-exploitation trade-off, our algorithms leverage the power of the "forgetting principle" in the learning processes, which is vital in changing environments. Our extensive numerical experiments on both synthetic and real world online auto-loan datasets show that our proposed algorithms achieve superior empirical performance compared to existing algorithms.