Interpreting Adversarial Examples by Activation Promotion and Suppression
This work provides interpretability insights for adversarial attacks, which is an incremental advancement in understanding and potentially improving robustness in machine learning models.
The paper tackles the problem of interpreting adversarial examples in convolutional neural networks by analyzing their effects on neuron activations, categorizing perturbations into suppression-dominated, promotion-dominated, and balanced types, and linking these to class-specific image regions and semantic concepts.
It is widely known that convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial examples: images with imperceptible perturbations crafted to fool classifiers. However, interpretability of these perturbations is less explored in the literature. This work aims to better understand the roles of adversarial perturbations and provide visual explanations from pixel, image and network perspectives. We show that adversaries have a promotion-suppression effect (PSE) on neurons' activations and can be primarily categorized into three types: i) suppression-dominated perturbations that mainly reduce the classification score of the true label, ii) promotion-dominated perturbations that focus on boosting the confidence of the target label, and iii) balanced perturbations that play a dual role in suppression and promotion. We also provide image-level interpretability of adversarial examples. This links PSE of pixel-level perturbations to class-specific discriminative image regions localized by class activation mapping (Zhou et al. 2016). Further, we examine the adversarial effect through network dissection (Bau et al. 2017), which offers concept-level interpretability of hidden units. We show that there exists a tight connection between the units' sensitivity to adversarial attacks and their interpretability on semantic concepts. Lastly, we provide some new insights from our interpretation to improve the adversarial robustness of networks.