CLApr 9, 2019

Performance Monitoring for End-to-End Speech Recognition

arXiv:1904.04896v12 citations
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This addresses performance monitoring for end-to-end ASR systems, which is incremental as it adapts previous techniques to a new setting.

The paper tackled the problem of monitoring performance for end-to-end speech recognition systems without ground-truth, adapting existing measures like Entropy and M-measure, and found that M-measure on decoder posteriors achieved the best predictive performance with an average error of 8.8%.

Measuring performance of an automatic speech recognition (ASR) system without ground-truth could be beneficial in many scenarios, especially with data from unseen domains, where performance can be highly inconsistent. In conventional ASR systems, several performance monitoring (PM) techniques have been well-developed to monitor performance by looking at tri-phone posteriors or pre-softmax activations from neural network acoustic modeling. However, strategies for monitoring more recently developed end-to-end ASR systems have not yet been explored, and so that is the focus of this paper. We adapt previous PM measures (Entropy, M-measure and Auto-encoder) and apply our proposed RNN predictor in the end-to-end setting. These measures utilize the decoder output layer and attention probability vectors, and their predictive power is measured with simple linear models. Our findings suggest that decoder-level features are more feasible and informative than attention-level probabilities for PM measures, and that M-measure on the decoder posteriors achieves the best overall predictive performance with an average prediction error 8.8%. Entropy measures and RNN-based prediction also show competitive predictability, especially for unseen conditions.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes