CVApr 16, 2019

A Comprehensive Study of Alzheimer's Disease Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks

arXiv:1904.07950v118 citations
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This work addresses reproducibility issues for researchers in medical imaging, but it is incremental as it focuses on benchmarking existing methods rather than introducing new ones.

The study tackled the problem of inconsistent performance comparisons in Alzheimer's disease classification from brain MRI scans by conducting a comprehensive evaluation on a full dataset, finding that most models perform similarly and that image preprocessing with Clinica increased accuracy from 63% to 89%.

A plethora of deep learning models have been developed for the task of Alzheimer's disease classification from brain MRI scans. Many of these models report high performance, achieving three-class classification accuracy of up to 95%. However, it is common for these studies to draw performance comparisons between models that are trained on different subsets of a dataset or use varying imaging preprocessing techniques, making it difficult to objectively assess model performance. Furthermore, many of these works do not provide details such as hyperparameters, the specific MRI scans used, or their source code, making it difficult to replicate their experiments. To address these concerns, we present a comprehensive study of some of the deep learning methods and architectures on the full set of images available from ADNI. We find that, (1) classification using 3D models gives an improvement of 1% in our setup, at the cost of significantly longer training time and more computation power, (2) with our dataset, pre-training yields minimal ($<0.5\%$) improvement in model performance, (3) most popular convolutional neural network models yield similar performance when compared to each other. Lastly, we briefly compare the effects of two image preprocessing programs: FreeSurfer and Clinica, and find that the spatially normalized and segmented outputs from Clinica increased the accuracy of model prediction from 63% to 89% when compared to FreeSurfer images.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes