Evaluating Artificial Systems for Pairwise Ranking Tasks Sensitive to Individual Differences
This addresses the challenge of assessing AI in subjective tasks with individual differences, though it is incremental as it focuses on evaluation rather than new ranking methods.
The authors tackled the problem of evaluating artificial systems on pairwise ranking tasks where human perception varies, proposing a method to quantify the probability that a system's ranking matches human-generated results and demonstrating it on an image material ranking task.
Owing to the advancement of deep learning, artificial systems are now rival to humans in several pattern recognition tasks, such as visual recognition of object categories. However, this is only the case with the tasks for which correct answers exist independent of human perception. There is another type of tasks for which what to predict is human perception itself, in which there are often individual differences. Then, there are no longer single "correct" answers to predict, which makes evaluation of artificial systems difficult. In this paper, focusing on pairwise ranking tasks sensitive to individual differences, we propose an evaluation method. Given a ranking result for multiple item pairs that is generated by an artificial system, our method quantifies the probability that the same ranking result will be generated by humans, and judges if it is distinguishable from human-generated results. We introduce a probabilistic model of human ranking behavior, and present an efficient computation method for the judgment. To estimate model parameters accurately from small-size samples, we present a method that uses confidence scores given by annotators for ranking each item pair. Taking as an example a task of ranking image pairs according to material attributes of objects, we demonstrate how the proposed method works.