Taxonomy of Saliency Metrics for Channel Pruning
This work addresses the challenge of isolating saliency metric effectiveness in pruning algorithms for researchers and practitioners in efficient deep learning.
The authors tackled the problem of evaluating saliency metrics for channel pruning in deep neural networks by proposing a taxonomy based on four principal components, and they found that some newly constructed metrics outperformed existing state-of-the-art ones.
Pruning unimportant parameters can allow deep neural networks (DNNs) to reduce their heavy computation and memory requirements. A saliency metric estimates which parameters can be safely pruned with little impact on the classification performance of the DNN. Many saliency metrics have been proposed, each within the context of a wider pruning algorithm. The result is that it is difficult to separate the effectiveness of the saliency metric from the wider pruning algorithm that surrounds it. Similar-looking saliency metrics can yield very different results because of apparently minor design choices. We propose a taxonomy of saliency metrics based on four mostly-orthogonal principal components. We show that a broad range of metrics from the pruning literature can be grouped according to these components. Our taxonomy not only serves as a guide to prior work, but allows us to construct new saliency metrics by exploring novel combinations of our taxonomic components. We perform an in-depth experimental investigation of more than 300 saliency metrics. Our results provide decisive answers to open research questions, and demonstrate the importance of reduction and scaling when pruning groups of weights. We find that some of our constructed metrics can outperform the best existing state-of-the-art metrics for convolutional neural network channel pruning.