LGMLJul 7, 2019

Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Network Optimization in Unknown Environments

arXiv:1907.04201v318 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the problem of efficient decision-making in complex, uncertain settings like influence maximization and routing for researchers and practitioners in network optimization, though it is incremental as it extends Thompson sampling to a more general framework.

The paper tackles combinatorial optimization in unknown environments by proposing Combinatorial Thompson Sampling (CTS), achieving regret bounds like O(∑ᵢ log T/(pᵢΔᵢ)) and showing CTS outperforms UCB-based algorithms by at least an order of magnitude in networking problems.

Influence maximization, adaptive routing, and dynamic spectrum allocation all require choosing the right action from a large set of alternatives. Thanks to the advances in combinatorial optimization, these and many similar problems can be efficiently solved given an environment with known stochasticity. In this paper, we take this one step further and focus on combinatorial optimization in unknown environments. We consider a very general learning framework called combinatorial multi-armed bandit with probabilistically triggered arms and a very powerful Bayesian algorithm called Combinatorial Thompson Sampling (CTS). Under the semi-bandit feedback model and assuming access to an oracle without knowing the expected base arm outcomes beforehand, we show that when the expected reward is Lipschitz continuous in the expected base arm outcomes CTS achieves $O(\sum_{i =1}^m\log T/(p_iΔ_i))$ regret and $O(\max\{\mathbb{E}[m\sqrt{T\log T/p^*}],\mathbb{E}[m^2/p^*]\})$ Bayesian regret, where $m$ denotes the number of base arms, $p_i$ and $Δ_i$ denote the minimum non-zero triggering probability and the minimum suboptimality gap of base arm $i$ respectively, $T$ denotes the time horizon, and $p^*$ denotes the overall minimum non-zero triggering probability. We also show that when the expected reward satisfies the triggering probability modulated Lipschitz continuity, CTS achieves $O(\max\{m\sqrt{T\log T},m^2\})$ Bayesian regret, and when triggering probabilities are non-zero for all base arms, CTS achieves $O(1/p^*\log(1/p^*))$ regret independent of the time horizon. Finally, we numerically compare CTS with algorithms based on upper confidence bounds in several networking problems and show that CTS outperforms these algorithms by at least an order of magnitude in majority of the cases.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes