Exploring the relations between net benefits of IT projects and CIOs' perception of quality of software development disciplines
This work addresses software development enterprises seeking to optimize management techniques, but it is incremental as it applies an existing model (Kano's) to a specific empirical context.
The paper tackled the problem of improving net benefits of IT projects by evaluating how the quality of software development disciplines relates to project outcomes, finding that altering must-be quality disciplines like testing can reduce benefits, while changing attractive quality disciplines like requirements acquisition can increase satisfaction and benefits.
Software development enterprises are under consistent pressure to improve their management techniques and development processes. These are comprised of several disciplines like requirements acquisition, design, coding, testing, etc. that must be continuously improved and individually tailored to suit specific software development project. This paper presents an evaluation approach that enables the enterprises to increase development process net benefits by improving disciplines' quality and increasing developers' satisfaction. Our approach builds on Kano's model of quality. Based on an empirical study of top 1000 enterprises from Slovenia we find that application of software development methodologies in individual development disciplines significantly relates to net benefits of IT projects. The results show that different types of Kano quality are present in individual disciplines. Enterprises should be cautious when altering must-be quality disciplines like testing or deployment as they can significantly disrupt the established routines, cause great dissatisfaction between developers and significantly reduce benefits. On the other hand, changing the attractive quality disciplines like requirements acquisition can notably increase developers' satisfaction and benefits but is less likely to disrupt the established routines.