Quantum algorithms for Second-Order Cone Programming and Support Vector Machines
This work addresses computational bottlenecks in optimization problems like SOCP and SVM for researchers and practitioners in quantum computing and machine learning, offering a polynomial speedup that is incremental relative to classical methods.
The paper tackles the problem of solving second-order cone programming (SOCP) and support vector machines (SVM) by proposing a quantum interior-point method that achieves a polynomial speedup over classical algorithms, with experimental evidence showing scaling exponents of 2.59 for quantum SVM versus 3.11 for classical SVM.
We present a quantum interior-point method (IPM) for second-order cone programming (SOCP) that runs in time $\widetilde{O} \left( n\sqrt{r} \frac{ζκ}{δ^2} \log \left(1/ε\right) \right)$ where $r$ is the rank and $n$ the dimension of the SOCP, $δ$ bounds the distance of intermediate solutions from the cone boundary, $ζ$ is a parameter upper bounded by $\sqrt{n}$, and $κ$ is an upper bound on the condition number of matrices arising in the classical IPM for SOCP. The algorithm takes as its input a suitable quantum description of an arbitrary SOCP and outputs a classical description of a $δ$-approximate $ε$-optimal solution of the given problem. Furthermore, we perform numerical simulations to determine the values of the aforementioned parameters when solving the SOCP up to a fixed precision $ε$. We present experimental evidence that in this case our quantum algorithm exhibits a polynomial speedup over the best classical algorithms for solving general SOCPs that run in time $O(n^{ω+0.5})$ (here, $ω$ is the matrix multiplication exponent, with a value of roughly $2.37$ in theory, and up to $3$ in practice). For the case of random SVM (support vector machine) instances of size $O(n)$, the quantum algorithm scales as $O(n^k)$, where the exponent $k$ is estimated to be $2.59$ using a least-squares power law. On the same family random instances, the estimated scaling exponent for an external SOCP solver is $3.31$ while that for a state-of-the-art SVM solver is $3.11$.