Learning Fair Rule Lists
This addresses the need for fair and interpretable models in high-stakes decision-making, offering an incremental improvement over existing interpretable methods.
The paper tackles the problem of developing fair and interpretable classification models by proposing FairCORELS, a method that learns fair rule lists, and demonstrates it outperforms interpretable fair techniques and is competitive with non-interpretable ones on real-world datasets.
As the use of black-box models becomes ubiquitous in high stake decision-making systems, demands for fair and interpretable models are increasing. While it has been shown that interpretable models can be as accurate as black-box models in several critical domains, existing fair classification techniques that are interpretable by design often display poor accuracy/fairness tradeoffs in comparison with their non-interpretable counterparts. In this paper, we propose FairCORELS, a fair classification technique interpretable by design, whose objective is to learn fair rule lists. Our solution is a multi-objective variant of CORELS, a branch-and-bound algorithm to learn rule lists, that supports several statistical notions of fairness. Examples of such measures include statistical parity, equal opportunity and equalized odds. The empirical evaluation of FairCORELS on real-world datasets demonstrates that it outperforms state-of-the-art fair classification techniques that are interpretable by design while being competitive with non-interpretable ones.