CRSep 24, 2019

Security analysis of two lightweight certificateless signature schemes

arXiv:1909.10816v11 citations
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This exposes security flaws in schemes designed for resource-constrained environments, highlighting critical risks for IoT and healthcare applications.

The paper demonstrates that two recently proposed lightweight certificateless signature schemes, intended for IoT and healthcare networks, are vulnerable to forgery attacks by adversaries, showing they can forge signatures on arbitrary messages.

Certificateless cryptography can be considered as an intermediate solution to overcome the issues in traditional public key infrastructure (PKI) and identity-based public key cryptography (ID-PKC). There exist a vast number of certificateless signature (CLS) schemes in the literature; however, most of them are not efficient enough to be utilized in limited resources environments such as Internet of things (IoT) or Healthcare Wireless Sensor Networks (HWSN). Recently, two lightweight CLS schemes have been proposed by Karati et al. and Kumar et al. to be employed in IoT and HWSNs, respectively. While both schemes are claimed to be existentially unforgeable, in this paper, we show that both these signatures can easily be forged. More specifically, it is shown that 1) in Karati et al.'s scheme, a type 1 adversary, considered in certificateless cryptography, can generate a valid partial private key corresponding to any user of its choice and as a consequence, it can forge any users' signature on any message of its choice, and 2) in Kumar et al.'s scheme, both types of adversaries which are considered in certificateless cryptography are able to forge any signer's signature on an arbitrary message.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes